🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of nations are considering parallel restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law is expected to be enacted in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard children from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to enact a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to prevent their children from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. Although it cautions of the "compulsive" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a useful foundation," commented a leading MEP supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Earlier, support gathered behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was eventually watered down. However, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a young person who died after encountering dangerous online content argues that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are secure and suitable for children," said a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, action is largely unfolding at the regional government level amid national gridlock.

• Utah demands parental consent for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a law banning under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a law capping teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also introduced measures mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans pose dangers and "may even have unintended consequences". The body points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

Even as this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.